<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>Energy 2.0 &#187; Biofuels</title> <atom:link href="http://energytwodotzero.org/category/alternative-energy/biofuels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://energytwodotzero.org</link> <description>Energy &#38; Environment</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:08:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Biomass Blues</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2011/09/07/biomass-blues/</link> <comments>http://energytwodotzero.org/2011/09/07/biomass-blues/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:38:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tara Holmes</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Media]]></category> <category><![CDATA[New England]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Other]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Politics & Policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://energytwodotzero.org/?p=7785</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/uw_digital_images/4558555048/sizes/s/in/photostream/"><img
src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3444/4558555048_185948a90c_m.jpg" alt="Single large tree leaning to left, Washington state by UW Digital Collections" width="240" height="160" class="alignright" /></a></p><p>Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick&#8217;s stance on <a
href="http://thephoenix.com/Boston/news/126074-biomass-faq/">biomass</a> has recently changed its tune from one of skepticism to one of acceptance as a state-wide &#8220;clean&#8221; energy policy. Why the sudden switch? State environmental groups, the same groups who helped lobby to get him into office, are wondering the same thing and are now turning against Patrick&#8217;s newfound position at large.</p><p>According to a recent <a
href="http://thephoenix.com/Boston/news/126080-devals-green-blues/?page=1#TOPCONTENT">article</a> in the Boston Phoenix, the Patrick administration will release a document in the next few weeks that will contain the final regulations for the state&#8217;s biomass subsidies.  According to environmental groups, the Administration is planning to reverse its original position as a nod towards a handful of developers who stand to make money off of biomass production.</p><p>These regulations will come at the expense of ordinary&#8230; <a
href="http://energytwodotzero.org/2011/09/07/biomass-blues/" class="read_more">[view entry]</a></p>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://energytwodotzero.org/2011/09/07/biomass-blues/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Mass Renewables Redux</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/07/21/mass-renewables-redux-2/</link> <comments>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/07/21/mass-renewables-redux-2/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:55:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>JPierce</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wind power]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://energytwodotzero.org/?p=5728</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>This time last year we reported that <a
href="/2009/07/17/biofuels-for-the-home-part-ii/">a state law requiring heating oil to contain a paltry 2% biodiesel was finally being enforced</a>. Alas, once again, <a
href="http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/green/articles/2010/07/02/mass_suspends_mandate_for_biofuel_use/">implementation has been delayed</a>.</p><p>Although Cape Wind gets most of the press, it is not the only contentious wind project in the Bay State. Last week the SJC ruled that a planned project in Western Mass. <a
href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/07/08/sjc_ruling_allows_wind_project_in_western_mass_to_proceed/">was legitimately permitted</a> and could proceed.</p><p>Finally, the state has also <a
href="http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2010/07/proposed_massachusetts_biomass.html">announced that it will be reviewing emissions regulations for biomass-fueled power plants</a>. Variously characterized as <a
href="http://www.biomassmagazine.com/article.jsp?article_id=3937">perplexing</a>, <a
href="http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/08/raising-the-bar-on-biomass/">raising the bar</a>, and <a
href="http://www.wwlp.com/dpp/news/local/franklin/a-win-for-biomass-opponents">a win for biomass opponents</a></p> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/07/21/mass-renewables-redux-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>King Corn, 1st in Environmental Film Series</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/06/24/king-corn-1st-environmental-film-series/</link> <comments>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/06/24/king-corn-1st-environmental-film-series/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:57:56 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>JesseGorden</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Events]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Food & Cooking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[corn]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category> <category><![CDATA[farming]]></category> <category><![CDATA[video]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://energytwodotzero.org/?p=5479</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/markusschoepke/264033079/"><img
src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/82/264033079_a19ec5cceb_m.jpg" alt="corn extending into the sky by *MarS" width="240" height="160" class="alignright" /></a> Several Boston/Cambridge groups have collectively organized an  open-ended Environmental  Film series, the kick-off of which was this past Tuesday, at Cambridge&#8217;s Main Library. The second film in the series, <a
href="http://www.kilowattours.org/about.php">Kilowatt Ours</a>, will be  shown  on July 29th in the same location: Bottom floor (L2), <a
href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=cambridge+main+library&#38;hl=en&#38;cd=1&#38;ei=a48jTNOMCIqQyATVkMWxBw&#38;sig2=OjW4G9FqEHMO7FDtDZp2Ew&#38;ie=UTF8&#38;view=map&#38;cid=14574332888293875543&#38;iwloc=A&#38;ved=0CE0QpQY&#38;sa=X">Cambridge Main Library, 449 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02138-4191</a> at 6:30pm. Another (yet to be selected) film will be shown on  August 19th, so save this date!</p><p>The first documentary &#8220;King Corn&#8221; was shown at 6:30 and light refreshments were served afterward.</p><p>This film follows two young men who, after finding corn molecules in strands of their hair,  trace their genealogical footsteps back to their Iowan homeland and learn that the land their ancestors once farmed is covered in corn. Not just corn, but a variety&#8230; <a
href="http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/06/24/king-corn-1st-environmental-film-series/" class="read_more">[view entry]</a></p>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/06/24/king-corn-1st-environmental-film-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Burning breakfasts for bus fuel</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/06/18/burning-breakfasts-bus-fuel/</link> <comments>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/06/18/burning-breakfasts-bus-fuel/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:06:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>JPierce</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Events]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://energytwodotzero.org/?p=5430</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://sierraclub.org/sierra/200709/biofuelschart.pdf"><img
src="http://energytwodotzero.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/biofuelschart.pdf-pages.jpg" alt="Biofuels by Peter Hoey for the Sierra Club" title="Biofuels by Peter Hoey for the Sierra Club" width="226" height="200" class="alignright size-full wp-image-5431" /></a></p><p>Although the specifics may have since changed, this <a
href="http://sierraclub.org/sierra/200709/biofuelschart.pdf">chart</a> from <a
href="http://sierraclub.org/sierra/200709/bio.asp">Bio Hope, Bio Hype</a> in the September 2007 issue of the Sierra Club&#8217;s magazine provides a nice overview of the major biofuel options.</p><p>What about moving <a
href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100216140152.htm">Beyond the Corn Field: Balancing Fuel, Food and Biodiversity</a>? After all, if there&#8217;s one thing that thing that our reliance on fossilized sunlight has taught us, it&#8217;s that that there should be room for every fuel that makes ecological (and economic) sense. Indeed, there are a number of <a
href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2010/tc2010063_168975.htm">exotic fuel feedstocks</a> you are probably not yet familiar with. Indeed, on Earth Day <a
href="http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/apr2010/2010-04-25-092.html">the Navy tested a bio-blend jet fuel</a> made from 50% <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelina_sativa">German sesame</a> seed oil. What of the much touted cellulosic ethanol? An alternative to the use of&#8230; <a
href="http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/06/18/burning-breakfasts-bus-fuel/" class="read_more">[view entry]</a></p>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/06/18/burning-breakfasts-bus-fuel/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Need to Know: It&#8217;s not impossible to ween ourselves off of coal &amp; oil</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/06/12/not-impossible-ween-coal-oil/</link> <comments>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/06/12/not-impossible-ween-coal-oil/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:44:35 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>JPierce</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wind power]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category> <category><![CDATA[video]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://energytwodotzero.org/?p=5317</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/"><img
src="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/wp-content/themes/ntk/images/logo.gif" height="95" width="164" alt="Need to Know" class="alignleft"/></a> PBS&#8217; new weekly news magazine&#8212;<a
href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/">Need to Know</a>&#8212;has been covering some interesting stories. The fifth episode aired last week, and included the piece below on the Danish isle of Samso&#8217;s effective elimination of fossil fuels within the past decade. FYI: rapeseed is what most of the planet calls canola, and the Danish subsidies for wind appear to be less than those in the U.S. <sup><a
href="#1">1</a></sup>.</p><p></p><p>They&#8217;ve also had some compelling coverage of the gulf spoil including <a
href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/environment/big-oils-chernobyl/1298/">Big Oil’s Chernobyl</a> and <a
href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/environment/a-chance-encounter-on-the-gulf-coast-with-a-bp-engineer/1370/">A chance encounter on the Gulf Coast with a BP engineer</a></p><p><sup><a
name="1">1</a>. <a
href="http://www.geni.org/globalenergy/policy/renewableenergy/subsidies/wind/denmark/index.shtml">Wind is subsidized at 30% of capital cost in Denmark</a>. Ignoring any state incentives, there is a <a
href="http://dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=US13F&#038;re=1&#038;ee=1">2.2&#162;/kWh federal tax-credit</a>. At <a
href="http://www.windustry.org/how-much-do-wind-turbines-cost">typical costs</a> and an average operating capacity of 50%, this amounts to</sup>&#8230; <a
href="http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/06/12/not-impossible-ween-coal-oil/" class="read_more">[view entry]</a></p>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/06/12/not-impossible-ween-coal-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Remember the rainforest?</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/02/19/remember-the-rainforest/</link> <comments>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/02/19/remember-the-rainforest/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:09:14 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>JPierce</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Food & Cooking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://energytwodotzero.org/?p=3795</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/greenpeace_esperanza/2842715280/"><img
src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3124/2842715280_710d28ed78_m.jpg" alt="Logging in PNG by Greenpeace Esperanza" width="240" height="160" class="alignleft" style="padding-top:7px" /></a> The poster child of human environmental destruction in the 90&#8242;s is still imperiled, even if the focus has shifted to global warming. Of course the two are intimately related, and besides the forests&#8217; huge impacts on local watersheds—effectively creating their own rain—the forests&#8217; trees and soils obviously have a major impact on the carbon cycle. Still, the onslaught upon the lungs of the world is not only unrelenting but expanding.</p><p>For instance, Brazil is currently pursuing a large hydroelectric project on the <a
href="http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/794/">Xingu River</a>. The <a
href="http://www.euinfrastructure.com/news/belo-monte-dam/">Belo Monte</a> will have 60% of the generating capacity of China&#8217;s controversial Three Gorges megadam project, making it the third largest in the world. Like Three Gorges, it will experience problems with siltation. The Amazon system is notoriously silty, and this is only&#8230; <a
href="http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/02/19/remember-the-rainforest/" class="read_more">[view entry]</a></p>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/02/19/remember-the-rainforest/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Tobacco powered trucks?</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/01/13/tobacco-powered-trucks/</link> <comments>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/01/13/tobacco-powered-trucks/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:45:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>JPierce</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Food & Cooking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Heating]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://energytwodotzero.org/?p=3475</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/washuugenius/1324618377/"><img
src="http://energytwodotzero.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/tobacco.jpg" alt="" title="Tobacco plants by Bethany Weeks" width="180" height="240" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3474" /></a> On their face, biofuels seem like a pretty good idea: carbon dioxide and sunlight in, carbon dioxide and energy out. Certainly some hobbyists manage to recover waste grease for use in diesel engines, but commercially the field has been dominated by the fermentation of sugars from food crops into ethanol. Unfortunately, due to the large petro-chemical inputs often employed <a
href="http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/study-us-biofuels-policies-flawed-28943.html">it is unclear whether the result is a net gain</a>. In addition, much attention has been given to the competing interests of fuel vs. food (vs. land conservation).</p><p>There is hope that research into the production of cellulosic ethanol, or alcohol from plant fibers, could soon tip the balance decidedly in favor of biofuels. One could use agricultural waste or fast-growing special cover crops however, this material should arguably be composted&#8230; <a
href="http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/01/13/tobacco-powered-trucks/" class="read_more">[view entry]</a></p>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://energytwodotzero.org/2010/01/13/tobacco-powered-trucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>BioFuels for your Home-Part II</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/07/17/biofuels-for-the-home-part-ii/</link> <comments>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/07/17/biofuels-for-the-home-part-ii/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:59:49 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Anthony Butler</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.energytwodotzero.org/?p=1726</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p><img
class="alignright size-full wp-image-1728" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/baystate-biofuel-logo.jpg" alt="baystate-biofuel-logo" width="216" height="93" /></p><p>Last week, Energy 2.0 received a phone call from Dr. Jesse Reich, CEO of Baystate BioFuels, whose company was recently profiled on NECN and on the <a
href="http://www.energytwodotzero.org/2009/07/03/your-heat-oil-now-contains-biofuel-its-the-law/">pages of Energy 2.0</a>. He provided us with some numbers on the use of BioFuels in the home that will be of interest to anyone who heats their home with oil and wants to reduce their use of non-renewable resources and the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> released into the atmosphere.</p><p>The average home uses approximately 730 gallons of heating oil each year-and each gallon of Number 2 home heating oil releases 22 lbs of CO<sub>2</sub> into the atmosphere. Pure Biodiesel reduces the CO<sub>2</sub> generated by approximately 85%. As mentioned previously, Massachusetts law now mandates each load of home heating oil contains 2% of biodiesel, which&#8230; <a
href="http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/07/17/biofuels-for-the-home-part-ii/" class="read_more">[view entry]</a></p>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/07/17/biofuels-for-the-home-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Your heating oil now contains biofuel. It&#8217;s the law</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/07/03/your-heat-oil-now-contains-biofuel-its-the-law/</link> <comments>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/07/03/your-heat-oil-now-contains-biofuel-its-the-law/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:14:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Anthony Butler</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Heating]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.energytwodotzero.org/?p=1561</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a little known fact that this winter will be the first in which Massachusetts requires home heating oil to include at least 2% biofuels, rising 1 percentage point each year until it reaches 5% in 2012. In 2009, that creates a 24 million gallon demand, and <a
href="http://www.baystatebiofuels.com" target="_blank">Baystate Biofuels</a> is here to fill it.</p><p>The company has taken over the disused tanks at an old Western Telecom building in North Andover and it plans to utilize solar power Osgood Landing had previously installed on the site, and Baystate Biofuels will tap into excess steam from a nearby waste-to-energy incinerator to heat the tanks to lower the viscosity of the pure biodiesel.</p><p>Energy 2.0 is checking on whether Baystate will be delivering to Cambridge this winter. In the meantime, check out&#8230; <a
href="http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/07/03/your-heat-oil-now-contains-biofuel-its-the-law/" class="read_more">[view entry]</a></p>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/07/03/your-heat-oil-now-contains-biofuel-its-the-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>7.2 Megawatts of Energy. We&#8217;ll drink to that.</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/01/21/72-megawatts-of-energy-well-drink-to-that/</link> <comments>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/01/21/72-megawatts-of-energy-well-drink-to-that/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:09:33 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Anthony Butler</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Alternative Energy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.energytwodotzero.org/?p=116</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Scotch drinkers who care for the climate will soon relish their tipple in the knowledge it is providing <a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/feedarticle/8298740" target="_blank">clean renewable power in the home of whisky</a>.</p><p>Helius Energy Plc said on Wednesday it and the Combination of Rothes Distillers Ltd would build the plant, which would use distillery by-products and wood chips to generate 7.2 megawatts of electricity, enough for about 9,000 homes, and heat.</p><blockquote><p>&#8220;Not only will it generate renewable heat and power, but it secures additional markets for our distillery co-products,&#8221;  said Frank Burns, general manager of the Combination of Rothes, which includes the Edrington Group–the producer of The Famous Grouse and Cutty Sark–Chivas Brothers, producer of Chivas Regal.</p></blockquote> ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/01/21/72-megawatts-of-energy-well-drink-to-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
