<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Massachusetts passes &#8220;Stretch Code&#8221; for higher efficiency buildings</title> <atom:link href="http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/05/17/massachusetts-passes-stretch-code-for-higher-efficiency-buildings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/05/17/massachusetts-passes-stretch-code-for-higher-efficiency-buildings/</link> <description>Energy &#38; Environment</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 15:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Banker &#38; Tradesman</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/05/17/massachusetts-passes-stretch-code-for-higher-efficiency-buildings/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link> <dc:creator>Banker &#38; Tradesman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:54:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.energytwodotzero.org/?p=1112#comment-142</guid> <description>[...] The latest darling of the Bay State’s save-the-earth-by-killing-all-our-jobs crowd is a new, “stretch’’ energy code passed by the Legislature this spring. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The latest darling of the Bay State’s save-the-earth-by-killing-all-our-jobs crowd is a new, “stretch’’ energy code passed by the Legislature this spring. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Massachusetts passes Stretch Code for higher efficiency &#124; Portable Greenhouse</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/05/17/massachusetts-passes-stretch-code-for-higher-efficiency-buildings/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link> <dc:creator>Massachusetts passes Stretch Code for higher efficiency &#124; Portable Greenhouse</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:17:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.energytwodotzero.org/?p=1112#comment-44</guid> <description>[...] Massachusetts passes Stretch Code for higher efficiency   Posted by root 6 minutes ago (http://www.energytwodotzero.org)        May 17 2009 buildings contribute to 80 of the total greenhouse gas emissions inefficient heating cooling and electric building needs you must be logged in to post a comment powered by wordpress and plainscape theme        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; Massachusetts passes Stretch Code for higher efficiency [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Massachusetts passes Stretch Code for higher efficiency   Posted by root 6 minutes ago (<a
href="http://www.energytwodotzero.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.energytwodotzero.org</a>)        May 17 2009 buildings contribute to 80 of the total greenhouse gas emissions inefficient heating cooling and electric building needs you must be logged in to post a comment powered by wordpress and plainscape theme        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | Massachusetts passes Stretch Code for higher efficiency [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JPierce</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/05/17/massachusetts-passes-stretch-code-for-higher-efficiency-buildings/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link> <dc:creator>JPierce</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:57:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.energytwodotzero.org/?p=1112#comment-39</guid> <description>Yeah, it looks like it. Thanks for pointing that out.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it looks like it. Thanks for pointing that out.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Massachusetts passes Stretch Code for higher efficiency &#124; Shed Kits</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/05/17/massachusetts-passes-stretch-code-for-higher-efficiency-buildings/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link> <dc:creator>Massachusetts passes Stretch Code for higher efficiency &#124; Shed Kits</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:59:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.energytwodotzero.org/?p=1112#comment-38</guid> <description>[...] Massachusetts passes Stretch Code for higher efficiency   Posted by root 19 hours ago (http://www.energytwodotzero.org)        Commercial renovations commercial buildings under 5000 square feet and specialty commercial buildings under 100000 square feet supermarkets you must be logged in to post a comment powered by wordpress and plainscape theme        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; massachusetts passes stretch code for higher efficiency [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Massachusetts passes Stretch Code for higher efficiency   Posted by root 19 hours ago (<a
href="http://www.energytwodotzero.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.energytwodotzero.org</a>)        Commercial renovations commercial buildings under 5000 square feet and specialty commercial buildings under 100000 square feet supermarkets you must be logged in to post a comment powered by wordpress and plainscape theme        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | massachusetts passes stretch code for higher efficiency [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bijan123</title><link>http://energytwodotzero.org/2009/05/17/massachusetts-passes-stretch-code-for-higher-efficiency-buildings/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link> <dc:creator>bijan123</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 10:14:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.energytwodotzero.org/?p=1112#comment-36</guid> <description>&quot;....But annual energy costs would be reduced on average by $1,360, for a net savings to the homeowner of $830 a year– a net savings of approximately $300 per year......&quot;
I understand the $830 net savings ... but what is the $300 net savings about? .... Are we double subtracting?!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;.But annual energy costs would be reduced on average by $1,360, for a net savings to the homeowner of $830 a year– a net savings of approximately $300 per year&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;</p><p>I understand the $830 net savings &#8230; but what is the $300 net savings about? &#8230;. Are we double subtracting?!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
